The Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project has rejected the judgment of the Federal Capital Territory High Court in Abuja ordering it to pay N100m damages to two officials of the Department of State Services over alleged defamation.
Justice Yusuf Halilu on Tuesday awarded N100m damages against SERAP in the N5.5bn suit filed by DSS officials, Sarah John and Gabriel Ogundele.
The court also ordered the organisation to issue public apologies, pay N1m litigation costs and 10 per cent annual post-judgment interest until the damages are fully paid.
Reacting via its official X handle, @SERAPNigeria, the group described the judgment as “seriously flawed” and vowed to challenge it at the appellate court.
SERAP stated, “This judgment is totally unacceptable to us. It is a travesty and a serious blow to civic space in Nigeria. It reflects a troubling pattern under the government of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu of using defamation laws to punish legitimate criticism and suppress accountability.”
The organisation disclosed that it had instructed its lawyers, Tayo Oyetibo (SAN) and Ebun-Olu Adegboruwa (SAN), to immediately file an appeal.
According to SERAP, the suit was “a textbook example of judicial harassment and a strategic lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP), designed to intimidate civil society and deter legitimate human rights advocacy.”
The group further accused the Federal Government of allegedly using state institutions to target critics and activists.
“The Tinubu government is misusing both the DSS and the judicial system to target activists, journalists, and ordinary Nigerians who are peacefully exercising their fundamental human rights,” it said.
SERAP also argued that the judgment failed to reflect the evidence before the court and ignored constitutional and international human rights protections.
It added that the ruling could create “a chilling effect on freedom of expression, civic participation, and anti-corruption work.”
“The judgment raises serious concerns regarding compliance with international human rights law. Judicial authorities must ensure that defamation laws are not weaponised to silence dissent or suppress legitimate advocacy.
“We are committed to pursuing all available legal avenues, including appeal, to ensure that the rule of law is upheld and that fundamental rights are protected. We stand resolute. We will continue to defend civic space, promote transparency, and advance accountability in Nigeria,” the statement added.
– Punch
